Basketball
Schedule
Roster
Statistics
Rankings
ACC Scoreboard
ACC Standings
Devils in the NBA
Players
Jordan Davidson
Jon Scheyer
Brian Zoubek
Lance Thomas
Steve Johnson
Nolan Smith
Kyle Singler
Olek Czyz
Miles Plumlee
Mason Plumlee
Ryan Kelly
Andre Dawkins
Seth Curry
Football
Schedule
Roster
Statistics
ACC Scoreboard
ACC Standings
Other
DukeUpdate Team
Facebook
Twitter
Duke Links 
Website Registrations
Home

Duke 78
Liberty 47

 

Purdue 78
Duke 68

 

Duke 76, Liberty 47.  November 28, 2003.   Sullivan Arena.
Purdue 78, Duke 68.  November 29, 2003.  Sullivan Arena.

   Sometimes a team can look better in a loss than a win, and despite Duke's second-half collapse against Purdue, the Devils played a lot harder in that game than against Liberty.  Duke went all-out on defense, though they did make mistakes.   The Devils attacked a physical team on the boards and won that battle 39-32, with 19 of them offensive rebounds.  As Coach K noted, the offense didn't help the defense, and there a few factors that went into that.  First, if you watched Purdue, it was obvious that everything ran through senior guard Kenneth Lowe.  He was the main scorer, defender and distributor, and he willed his team to victory.  Duke does not have such a figure on the team right now, and might not have one all season.  This doesn't mean that they can't be a great team if such a player doesn't emerge (though I suspect it may well be Luol Deng), but it does mean that they'll have to change their approach a bit.  It seems that the guards, JJ Redick and Dan Ewing in particular, are trying to do too much by themselves.  The team's mantra must be Simplify and Trust.  Don't try to do too much by yourself, and trust in your teammates' ability to get open, set screens and hit shots.  As Coach K would say, the mentality must not be, "This is my shot that I have to make" but rather "This is our shot that we have to take."  Every player is responsible for the team's failures and successes.  Even in the above example, it's possible that Ewing & Redick could have gotten better looks at the basket if the posts were setting better screens.   The key to this trust is communication, something that has been fading in and out all season long.  When the team talks at both ends of the court, they are capable of creating some magic. When they don't, Duke is a lot easier to defend.  While some may point out that fatigue was a factor for Duke, I would note that Coach K puts his team in these situations deliberately in order to get them to execute at a high level when they are tired.  The Devils simply didn't do a very good job of this in their first high-level test.

  The Liberty game was a good example of Duke not looking as good as the final score indicated, because the Flames were so shockingly inept.  They turned the ball over constantly, had only had consistent offensive player, and fouled every time Duke drove on them.  Duke's own turnover difficulties in the first half contributed to the tight halftime margin of 27-20.  The first nine minutes of the game saw many Duke misses and only 6 points and an assist by Deng had Duke with 13-11.  Duke finally went on a little run, spurred by a Redick three from Randolph.   Duhon then got a steal and layup, and Deng followed up with a 10' jumper.  After Liberty pulled within 18-16 with a three, Duhon jump-started another break with a rebound and feed downcourt to Ewing.  The Devils closed out the half with a drive and tip-in by Shelden Williams and a long Duhon three with the shot clock running down.  Deng had 8 points, Williams 6 and Duhon 6 with 3 steals.  There was nothing wrong with Duke's defense, but shooting 10-34 just won't get the job done.

  Duke was much more efficient in the second half, shooting 15-25 from the field and turning it over just 6 times.  Even the bench, which got some extended minutes, played with a purpose for the first time in a while. Ewing rallied from a bad first half for 10 points in the second stanza as Duke slowly pulled away.  A cut from Ewing and a Duhon drive put Duke up by 11, and a Ewing three later made it 12.  Duke put the game away over the next few minutes, with a Duhon-to-Ewing-to-Deng fast break, a Redick three, a Shavlik Randolph post-up, a Duhon three point play on a drive, and 5 straight points from Ewing.  With eight minutes to go, Duke led 57-30.  After that, it was mostly free throws, as Duke shot 17-24 for the game.

  Duke's game plan for Purdue was to beat them to the punch by emphasizing post play.  Early in the game, Shelden Williams pummelled the Boilers, scoring on a post-up, a couple of stickbacks and on two perfect feeds by Duhon.  When he went out, Duhon kept feeding Randolph inside for a couple of three point plays.  Duke was flowing nicely as Duhon fed Redick after he grabbed a rebond, and then JJ drove and kicked back to Ewing for a three.  Duke led 23-18 with under nine minutes to go in the half.  Purdue struck back after a few Duke misses to take a 24-23 lead, and the two teams went back and forth for the next few minutes.  Finally, 2 Redick free throws put Duke back on top 29-28.  A stickback and foul shot by Deng kept Duke there, but a Boiler three gave them a 33-32 lead with under four minutes left.

  Williams took over once again with a turnaround jumper and later hit a free throw.  With time running down in the half, Ewing passed to Redick on the wing, who hit a three while being mugged, and completed the 4 point play.  Duhon blocked a three point attempt by Purdue to preserve a hard-won 6 point advantage.  The Devils had played solid help defense, drawing three offensive fouls, including a charge taken by Shav.   Duke limited their turnovers to just 5, which helped them overcome 3-10 shooting from three.  Redick found different ways to score and wound up with 10 points, but Williams was the star of the half with 13 points and 7 rebounds.  Purdue would have to change their strategy a bit.

  First, they started fronting Duke's big men, and would also put a man behind to cut off the lob.   Second, they put the ball in Lowe' hands and trusted him to make things happen.  Before Duke could blink, the Boilers went on an 11-0 run out of halftime, a punch that staggered Duke.  A Williams hook shot was met by 5 more Purdue points.  Finally, Duke recovered with a 6-0 run of their own, led by Redick hitting a short jumper and Deng scoring on a stickback and steal.  Luol had been struggling the entire game but was finding ways to contribute.  Duke pulled within 54-51 (thanks to a Duhon drive and a Deng dropstep) but missed a three and a chance to tie.  Purdue went on an 8-2 run that opened up just enough room to hold the Devils off.

  Duke kept trying, pulling with 64-58 on a Deng three point play, and 72-65 on a Ewing three.  Purdue hit all of their free throws down the stretch.  Duke's problem in the second half was turnovers.  Redick and Duhon had 4 apiece as they were trying too hard to create off the dribble. JJ was 0-5 from three in the half, Ewing was 1-4 overall in the half, and Shav barely got to touch the ball.  The team was simply a bit tight and trying too hard.  The good news for Duke is that the season is a marathon, not a sprint.  Right now, they are lagging behind some other teams, but for the team it's a matter of getting the sand out of its gears than having to perform a total overhaul.  The team still has a number of different ways to score, with a legitimate low-post presence in Williams, a versatile inside/outside scorer in Randolph, a do-it-all guy in Deng, a slasher/shooter in Ewing, a pure shooter in Redick and a playmaker in Duhon.  This isn't the 1997 team that had to rely on jumpshooting because it had nothing else.  The defense is solid and promises to get better. Team rebounding is very good.  However, everyone needs to find ways to help each other.  They'll find out what they learned very shortly, since Michigan State is loaded with wing scorers and has a powerful post threat in Paul Davis.

 ** Negatives:

 1. Offensive flow.   It was herky-jerky the whole time.  When Purdue started fronting Duke's big men, the Devils took quick jumpers instead of trying to find the best open shot.  Some players tried to do some things they were that good at instead of finding ways to lean on their strengths.

 2. Help defense.   Lowe did a magnificent job of drawing in an extra defender and either passing to a cutting post or dishing out to an open shooter.  The Boilers just looked like a more experienced team even if they didn't necessarily have better talent.

 3. Valuing the ball.   Above all else, this killed the Devils and has been a problem all year.  It's not like a lot of the turnovers came as a result of pressure, either--Purdue was sagging off to protect the basket from drives.  Duke simply made a number of mistakes, possibly exacerbated by the "I MUST make this play mentality" that afflicted the team.

  ** Positives:

 1. Offensive rebounding.  Despite the fact that Purdue had plenty of beef to throw at Duke, Williams, Duhon & Deng were relentless in going to the offensive boards, something that helped Duke stay in the game.

 2. Post defense.   Williams and Randolph, in terms of on-ball defense, are doing a fine job down low.  Both are challenging every shot and getting the tough boards.  Deng is also quickly becoming a solid post defender, though he sometimes takes a few too many risks on the perimeter.

 3. Ball pressure.   Duhon was out of his mind with his defensive pressure, picking up a couple of steals and forcing a 5 second call.  His defense right now is at a level reminiscient of his freshman year.

 Player-by-Player:

 ** Williams:  Shelden blocked 7 shots in these two games, totalled 25 points and grabbed 17 rebounds.  He's a bit erratic at the line (3-7) and doesn't always work hard enough to get open, but there's no question that he's done a great job defensively and on the boards.  When he does get the ball, he's showing a number of different ways to score, including a turnaround jumper and a more polished dropstep.  He needs to work on becoming a more efficient passer, making himself more available by working around the defense, and learning when to clear out for penetrators.  He's certainly still a work in progress but there is indeed progress being made.

 ** Deng: Luol can still do anything on the floor, and quickly learned to find ways to contribute when his shot isn't falling.  His bread-and-butter shot, a short turnaround jumper, wasn't going in and as a result Duke struggled.   Still, his rebounding and defense were stellar in both games, with a couple of exceptions.  While it's important for him to hunt good shots, he shouldn't get discouraged with the ball.  Above all else, he should avoid passing up good open shots in order to drive and take more difficult ones.

 ** Ewing:  Dan's 8-20 showing was less than impressive in these two games. Hitting just 3-9 against Purdue was one of the crippling factors in the game, as it seemed that he rushed nearly every shot.   Oddly, he was fairly efficient from three (4-10), but missed on a lot of drives and layups.  He had trouble handling Lowe, who seemed a bit too strong for him.  Dan sometimes just seems like he's in too much of a hurry to do everything, and just needs to slow down a bit.  I wouldn't mind seeing him run the point for a minute or two at a time.

 ** Duhon: The bad news for Chris is that he's turning the ball over too much for a point guard.  The good news is that his floor vision is as excellent as ever, and he created a number of great opportunities for his teammates with some pinpoint passes.  He avoided long-range bombs for the most part and instead concentrated on driving.  Chris finished a number of drives with layups, some by getting fouled, and others by finding the open man.   As I mentioned above, his ball pressure is excellent and his lateral quickness seems greatly improved--it's much harder for opposing guard to turn the corner on him.

 ** Randolph:  After a solid game against Liberty (not a lot of points but good rebounding & block totals) and a good first half against Purdue, Shav pretty much disappeared in the second half against Purdue.  The Boilers respected him and pretty much gave him the same treatment as they did Shelden, so K countered by putting both of them in the game.  No one got Shav the ball during this time, though he didn't help matters with a miss and a turnover the couple of times he did see the ball.  He also didn't do anything on the boards, being blocked out by Purdue pretty easily.   Shav will need to fight a lot harder against Michigan State to make an impact.

 ** Dockery: Dock's shot looks as awful as ever, but he actually picked up a few assists in the first half.  He did his usual good job of disrupting the offense as well.

 ** Horvath: Nick looked completely unprepared to make any kind of impact in either game, missing shots, fouling and turning the ball over.  He needs to bring more energy and hustle into the game, worrying about rebounding and defense rather than getting a look at the basket.

 ** Thompson: Michael played well against Liberty with a spin and a tip-in, but his eye injury kept him out of the finals.  His decision to transfer was not entirely shocking and may be one reason why the team has seemed so tense.  Whenever someone is unhappy with their playing time, it affects the other players, especially when a program stresses unity.  Hopefully he'll be happy whereever he goes, and Duke will close ranks.

 ** Melchionni: Lee's recent lack of playing time has been disturbing, though he hasn't looked that great when he has been out there until the Liberty game.  Coach K really could have used another scorer to set off a spark for his team, and I think Lee can be this player.

 ** Borman: Andy hit a three in the Liberty game that was nothing but net.

       Rob's Archive

 

Rob is a thirty four year old Duke grad who's been an ACC fan since he was nine years old, when a young Duke team was beaten in the finals by Kentucky.  Since that time, he has been fascinated by the entire league and started writing volumes on it in rec.sport.basketball.college and other electronic forums in 1991.  Recently, he has been writing ACC analyses for Jazzy J's About.com site and regularly contributes features on women's basketball for the Duke Basketball Report.